![]() Remove the website from Chrome's history.Select all instances of Big Timer in the search results.Press CMD+Y on a Mac or CTRL-H on Windows.If that doesn't help, please clear your browser history for .: Chrome Press CMD+Shift+R on a Mac or CTRL+Shift+R on Windows to force-reload the page. ![]() Please go to in a browser with javascript enabled to use Big Timer. I've never seen teams be as efficient and fast as the ones adopting this approach.Big Timer | Fullscreen countdown timer Big Timerīig Timer is a fullscreen countdown timer for workshops, presentations and meetings in your browser Utilize a timer and change the driver often. Use a visual collaboration tool, a shared document, or a code editor, and write together! On the same line of thinking, instead of long, useless meetings, or writing pedantic, bureaucratic, asynchronous long forms (like the 30 bullet points of the article), I'm a big proponent of pair/mob activities within small teams: I agree that writing has other benefits and it's better in certain cases but we need to get out of the mindset that writing/async is always better.Ī direct, face-to-face conversation is usually way faster than a ping-pong chat on Slack or, worse, especially for day-to-day activities. I often prefer a quick chat to spend 30 minutes writing Slack messages back and forth. Talking to someone is by far the fastest way to convey information. Then, I'm quite in line with this comment from Face-to-face communication is very underrated nowadays, probably because of the negative connotations associated with meetings. If you want to socialize, just socialize, since no tool can do that for you. Would you like to know your new remote colleague? Book a call with her.Īnd so on, on a list of examples that I'd like to sum up in this sentence: I wouldn't say I like this approach, since it's based on the assumption (wrong in my opinion) that using a tool or a set of rules to enforce social communication, will solve the socialization problem.ĭo you want to talk about a book? Talk about it. > Automatic occasionally: “Social questions” phone), but those cases are very rare indeed so not worth having a process for. If something is truly urgent, the sender will find a way to reach you (e.g. When you embrace asynchronous communication and you expect people to manage their own time, you should be empowered to send a note at any time because recipients should have the maturity to manage when they read. ![]() ![]() The expectation of immediate response is toxic." >"Never expect or require someone to get back to you immediately unless it’s a true emergency. Writing, rather than speaking or meeting, is independent of schedule and far more direct. Calendars have nothing to do with communication. > Communication shouldn’t require schedule synchronization. There may not be a perfect time, but there’s certainly a wrong time. Early Monday morning communication may be buried by other things. You may have some spare time on a Sunday afternoon to write something, but putting it out there on Sunday may pull people back into work on the weekends. Sharing something at 5pm may keep someone at work longer. Some good items in there but I disagree 100% with Guideline 25: Trying to act like this was simply a "no politics" rule, when it was actually a "don't criticize the leaders of our company" rule, show they either weren't paying attention to this when it happened or that have an agenda to push. > Employees say the founders’ memos unfairly depicted their workplace as being riven by partisan politics, when in fact the main source of the discussion had always been Basecamp itself. The move, which has sparked widespread discussion in Silicon Valley, follows a similar move from cryptocurrency company Coinbase last year. > Discussion about the list and how the company ought to hold itself accountable for creating it led directly to CEO Jason Fried announcing Tuesday that Basecamp would ban employees from holding “societal and political discussions” on the company’s internal chat forums. What once had felt like an innocent way to blow off steam, amid the ongoing cultural reckoning over speech and corporate responsibility, increasingly looked inappropriate, and often racist. But others were Asian, or African, and eventually the list - titled “Best Names Ever” - began to make people uncomfortable. > Many of the names were of American or European origin. One invoked the sorts of names Bart Simpson used to use when prank calling Moe the Bartender: Amanda Hugginkiss, Seymour Butz, Mike Rotch. More than a decade later, current employees were so mortified by the practice that none of them would give me a single example of a name on the list. > Around 2009, Basecamp customer service representatives began keeping a list of names that they found funny. The policy was sparked by employees complaining about horrible behavior, and then rather than deal with the horrible behavior they decided to ban discussions about it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |